Eudora Welty (, 1965) was an important, relatively early supporter.Literally scores of critical works have praised, scrutinized, and dissected the novel.
Eudora Welty (, 1965) was an important, relatively early supporter.Literally scores of critical works have praised, scrutinized, and dissected the novel.Tags: Thesis Statement Academic WritingShort Research Paper AssignmentsEssay On Snow Falling On CedarsAlgebra Homework SheetsCommunist Russia EssaysMedia Company Business Plan
He thinks of Jane Gallagher, for example, not as a maturing young woman but as the girl with whom he used to play checkers.
He goes out of his way to tell us that he and Jane had no sexual relationship. Holden comforted Jane when she was distressed, and it bothers him that Jane may have been subjected to sexual advances from her drunken stepfather or from her date, Holden's roommate, Stradlater.
The novel did well commercially but was not the most popular work of fiction in 1951.
It was on the could be purchased in translation in Denmark, Germany, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, Sweden, Switzerland, and the Netherlands.
(which is written in the style of the novel itself and will annoy the hell out of you) doesn't actually have much to say about the work that would become a worldwide phenomenon and one of the most commonly cited "favorite books" of all time.
It runs through the general plotline (using the word "crumby" six times, including in the title "Aw, the World's a Crumby Place"), notes a few complaints about its length, but then concludes with the thought that the novel is worth reading all over again. Salinger's rendering of teen-age speech is wonderful: the unconscious humor, the repetitions, the slang and profanity, the emphasis, all are just right.Holden's enemy is the adult world and the cruelty and artificiality that it entails.The people he admires all represent or protect innocence.For most of the book, Holden sees this as a primary virtue.It is very closely related to his struggle against growing up.Are you sure you want to remove #book Confirmation# and any corresponding bookmarks?is the protection of innocence, especially of children.In another widely quoted assessment, (November 1951) complained about the "excessive use of amateur swearing and coarse language" and suggested that "some of the events stretch probability," calling Holden "monotonous and phony." British reviewers were generally unimpressed.(September 7, 1951) complains that the "endless stream of blasphemy and obscenity" gets boring after the first chapter.The unusual thing about Salinger's first novel is its staying power. On July 14, 1951, the magazine, we might expect extensive attention from that publication, and such was the case; S. Behrman wrote an unusually long and strong review (August 11, 1951), stressing the personal attraction of Phoebe and Holden as characters.The Book-of-the-Month Club selected the novel as a summer alternate, assuring significant sales and widespread attention.