Genetically Modified Foods Research Paper

Monsanto and other agriculture companies have a financial stake in the research and messaging surrounding GM foods and have the resources to fund research that reinforces their narrative.

Tags: Websites That Do Your HomeworkAcknowledgement Page For ThesisUni Potsdam BwlFahrenheit 451 EssaysCreative Ways To Write NamesNull Pointer Assignment

In 2016, global land use for GM crops reached 185.1 million hectors.

Although GM foods had helped sustain the nutritional needs of human beings and farm animals and mounting evidence showed that GM foods were substantially equivalent to traditionally bred food sources, it has also sparked fierce debate about its safety.

Others point to the benefits of sturdier crops with higher yields.

"GM crops can improve yields for farmers, reduce draws on natural resources and fossil fuels and provide nutritional benefits," according to a statement on the website for Monsanto, the world's largest manufacturer of GMOs.

For instance, the banana tree is propagated entirely through cloning methods. By far, the biggest use of GMO technology is in large-scale agricultural crops. According to the World Health Organization, one of the most widely used methods for incorporating pest resistance into plants is through Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) genetics, a bacterium that produces proteins that repel insects.

At least 90% of the soy, cotton, canola, corn and sugar beets sold in the United States have been genetically engineered. GMO crops that are modified with the Bt gene have a proven resistance to insect pests, thus reducing the need for wide-scale spraying of synthetic pesticides.According to the National Library of Medicine (part of the National Center for Biotechnology Information, or NCBI), genetically engineered, or GM, foods are those that have had foreign genes from other plants or animals inserted into their genetic codes.This has resulted in foods that are consistently flavored, as well as resistant to disease and drought.A minority of respondents (11.7%) claimed they understood the basic principles of GM technology, while most were either “neutral” or “unfamiliar with GM technology”.Most respondents (69.3%) obtained their information on GM food through the Internet and 64.3% of respondents thought that media coverage was predominately negative on GM food.The reasons given by consumers in favor of, or against, the use of GM food, were complex, as seen by the response of 13.8% of respondents who felt GM technology was a form of bioterrorism targeted at China.China’s Ministry of Agriculture and the science community generally expressed a positive attitude toward GM food, but the percentage of respondents that trusted the government and scientists was only 11.7 and 23.2%, respectively.After more than 25 years of research and development on the genetic modification of a wide range of crops for food and fodder, China has reached a decision point as to whether it should accept, reject, or go slow with the use of genetically modified (GM) technology to produce the food and feed needed to sustain its population growth and economic renaissance.Here, we report a consumer survey on GM food that includes input from all provinces in China.We support these positions and the FDA's approach."According to GMO Answers, an industry group comprised of Monsanto, Du Pont, Dow Agro Sciences, Bayer, BASF, Crop Science and Syngenta, GMO agricultural products are "by far the most regulated and tested product in agricultural history."Additionally, their website states that "many independent scientists and organizations around the world — such as the U. National Academy of Sciences, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, World Health Organization, American Medical Association and the American Association for the Advancement of Science — have looked at thousands of scientific studies and concluded that GM food crops do not pose more risks to people, animals or the environment than any other foods."The political issue that GMOs have become is almost as conductive as the scientific debate.However, after much discussion among various lawmakers across the U.