His experiences as a monk and a priest were fulfilling to his Catholic enlightenment.Tags: Resume Writing Services In DubaiMarketing Problem SolvingThe Movie Life Is Beautiful EssayAn Inconvenient Truth Analysis EssayDissertations DonateBusiness Plan Explanation
Many people say that Martin Luther started the Protestant Reformation by nailing his 95 theses on the front gate of the Catholic Church.
Some of these people also say that these theses were an attack on the Church. Martin Luther, a brilliant philosopher during the Renaissance, traveled to Rome in 1511 as the delegated representative of seven allied Augustinian monasteries to protest against some improvements of Staupitz.
Professor Reynolds ran the three essays through a computer and found them to be "statistically indistinguishable from uncontested Hobbes texts."As a result, the University of Chicago Press jumped at the opportunity to publish "Three Discourses: A Critical Modern Edition of Newly Identified Work of the Young Hobbes," edited by Professors Reynolds and Saxonhouse.
Both leaders of their generations, Martin Luther and Niccolo Machiavelli were also religious and political icons.
"And what you learn from Machiavelli is that social order is not something natural, not handed down.
It's something we have to create."Professor Harvey Mansfield, a political scientist at Harvard, said: "If Machiavelli came first, then it suggests that an occasional act of tyranny might be necessary to save freedom."But Professor Pocock said simply that the issue of who was first was "meaningless." He explained, "The word 'modern' can, and does, have too many meanings to make a single question like that worth asking."The debate over the birth of modern political thought -- one of the classics in scholarly feuding -- dates to 1952.
In one of the most bruising clashes to appear in an academic journal (in this case, Political Theory, in the early 1970's) Professor Mansfield, a Straussian political scientist, said that traditionalists who could not accept Strauss's notion that Machiavelli was the "harbinger of modernity" were unfairly giving Strauss "the silent treatment."Professor Pocock, a leading specialists in Hobbes, responded by asserting that the Straussians were becoming paranoid, stooping to such tactics as filling departmental vacancies only with true believers and refusing to attend classes taught by non-Straussians.
Amid some less-than-lighthearted talk of "plunging bayonets" into each other, Professor Mansfield counterattacked by denouncing Professor Pocock for "misrepresentations, insults and name calling."In 1972, Professor Saxonhouse, a Straussian, was an untenured assistant professor at the University of Michigan when she wandered into the crossfire.
Both men were determined to break up the monopoly of knowledge and power that the Catholic Church held over the people.
Through examination of Machiavelli's The Prince, and Martin Luther's Christian Liberty, their different views on the individual, God, and the state will be compared and contrasted to better understand their issues with the Catholic Church.