An essay on capital punishment is an ethics essay which is primarily based on a social concern or matter.
Writing this type of an essay can be a very complex task as it requires immense brainstorming and research and has to be written in a manner so as not to offend any conflicting schools of thoughts.
Individuals that believe in the death penalty believe that capital punishment will deter murderers.
In this paper, I will be arguing that the death penalty does not deter criminals and that the United States should outlaw the practice.
While writing a capital punishment essay a writer has to keep various aspects in mind and follow certain guidelines for scripting a good essay, some of which have been outlined below by the expert writers of Prof Essays.com: These are the basic parameters of writing a capital punishment essay.
However, there are also various other intricate details which a writer needs to keep in mind while scripting this type of an essay.Those against capital punishment can argue in their term papers that one of the most disturbing issues facing the death penalty implementation is that of innocence.Suppose an innocent man or woman is executed, and then further investigation uncovers the heinous fact that another person committed the crime?In 1972, Lucy Adams notes, the United States Supreme Court in the case of (1972) invalidated the death penalty statutes of all of the states on the basis that sentencing authorities had too much discretionary authority with respect to its application and that such discretionary power had led to a situation where the death penalty’s application had become loaded with discrimination, such discrimination between at odds with the principle of equal justice under the law.This temporary abolition of the death penalty did not long endure. Supreme Court found, in The majority’s opinion in Furman v.States responded to the court’s decision by re-doing their death penalty statutes so as to give them the appearance of rationality and non-discrimination. Georgia had the potential to alter the legal, political, and social history of the United States.It had the potential to halt the United States in its quest for the title as the only developed democratic nation that still executes its citizens…Rather than unequivocally condemning the death penalty as prima facie ‘cruel and unusual,’ the majority in Furman went no further than holding that it was unconstitutional as it was then employed. era; since 1976 38% of those executed were blacks, black people making up only 12% of the population (382). At the present time DNA technology has awakened new opposition to this ultimate and irrevocable sanction because it has underscored the point that some people accused of capital crimes are being wrongly convicted and wrongly sentenced.Before I make my argument, I would like to provide some background information regarding the death penalty to the readers.The idea of capital punishment was brought over from Britain, when the founding fathers declared independence.In a coldly bureaucratic way a human being is muscled into a room, strapped down, and dispatched from this world—often in a way that is very painful and degrading—while the family of the murderer’s victim coldly look on. Is the transient, partial satisfaction of the ignoble need for vengeance to dominate, to over-ride, our basic humanity, our sense of forgiveness, and our fundamental decency?Often this human being has lived for a decade or more in anticipation of this event. When a human being is put to death by society, something decent about society—a hope for the further growth of civilization—is put to death also.