14 persons did not obey the experimenter and stopped before reaching the highest levels.
All 40 participants continued to give shocks up to 300 volts.
The experiment will test whether a person can keep administering painful electric shocks to another person just because they are ordered to do so.
The expectation is that very few will keep giving shocks, and that most participants will disobey the order. They were recruited by advertisement in a newspaper and were paid $4.50.
Page 1: Title, Author, Work/School Page 2: Abstract: A short summary of the article. References Through the text there are references, sources of knowledge, which you've used.
Page 3-: Introduction Current theories about the topic. Citing those will give you more credibility because good research is thought to be based on other knowledge and empirical (observed) evidence.Tables, Figures, Appendix The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).This means you're free to copy, share and adapt any parts (or all) of the text in the article, as long as you give appropriate credit and provide a link/reference to this page. You don't need our permission to copy the article; just include a link/reference back to this page.DISCLAIMER: This article is not written by Stanley Milgram, but is intended as an example of a psychology research paper that someone might have written after conducting the first Milgram-study. Normally you would use double spacing in the paper.There are few facts about the role of obedience when committing acts against one’s personal conscience (1961).Beyond this point, the learner became completely silent and refused to answer any more questions.The experimenter then instructed the participant to treat this silence as an incorrect response and deliver a further shock.The study shows that people are able to harm others intentionally if ordered to do so.It provides evidence that this dynamic is far more important than previously believed, and that personal ethics are less predictive of such behavior. Discussion and Conclusion What are our thought about the results compared to other relevant theories.In the recent war trial with Adolph Eichmann, he claims to only have been “following orders". Can people harm others because they are merely obeying orders?Can people be ordered to act against their moral convictions?