In addition to having the obligation to make money for stockholders, corporate executives have the obligation to see that these obligations are complied within an organization.
They also have obligations to the company’s employees, for example to maintain a safe working place. a company even though most of the time whistle blowing is justified. If people like Agent Rowley stop blowing the whistle, there will be more days like ...
Further more, the moral principles that you must consider all people’s interests equally prohibits giving preference to one’s own group.
So there most be considered justification for not giving as much weight to the interest of the stockholders investing in corporate firms because they do so with the knowledge that they take on financial risk if management acts illegally or immorally.
Same as if the employees of a company know that it is engaged in illegal or immoral activities and do not take action, including whistle blowing, to end the activities, then they must bear some of the guilt for the actions.
Term Paper On Whistleblowing Abstract On A Research Paper
These in turn cancel the principles that one should refrain from blowing the whistle because speaking out would cause harm to the organization.Unless it can be shown that the harm to the employees and stockholders would be significantly greater than the harm caused by the organizational wrong doing, the obligation to avoid unnecessary harm to the public must come first.This must be true even when there is specific agreements not to speak out.Although there are obvious differences between the situation of employees who work for government agencies and those who work for private firms, if we leave apart the special case in which national security was involved, then the same principles apply to both. According to this theory, the employee and employer are found in a reciprocal relationship and obligations are developed during their interactions (Saks ...The Codes of Ethics of Government Service to which all government employees are expected to conform requires that employees put loyalty to moral principles and the national interest above loyalty to the public parties or the agency for which they work. organization, contrary to those who are disengaged and can even harm the company.Customer loyalty Although research on the consequences of ...Neither can one justify participation in an illegal or immoral activity by arguing that one was merely following orders.One of the most fundamental of these obligations is not to cause harm to others.Corporate executives are no more exempt from this obligation than other people.If this were true, corporate executives would have no obligations to the public.However, no matter what one’s special obligation, one is never exempt from the general obligations we have to our fellow human beings.