Do reference popular literature or WWW sites if you can help it (this is a matter of style more than anything else -- you want to reference articles in refereed conferences and journals, if possible, or in other theses).Also in the introduction, you want to survey any related work that attempted something similar to your own, or that has a significant supporting role in your research. You cite the work in the references, not the researchers themselves. Thus, the model you develop and write about (and indeed, that you defend) should be one that has lasting value.
Here, you should clearly state the thesis and its importance.
This is also where you give definitions of terms and other concepts used elsewhere.
Will your dissertation be valuable 20 years from now (ca 2020), or have you referred to technologies that will be of only historical interest?
This model is tough to construct, but is really the heart of the scientific part of your work.
The progress of science is that we learn and use the work of others (with appropriate credit).
Assume you have a technically literate readership familiar with (or able to find) common references.This involves clearly showing how your implementation model matches the conditions of your abstract model, describing all the variables and why you set them as you do, accounting for confounding factors, and showing the results.You must be careful to not expend too much effort describing how standard protocols and hardware work (use citations to the literature, instead). This may be folded into Chapter III in some theses, or it may be multiple chapters in a thesis with many parts (as in a theory-based thesis).Perhaps the best way to understand how an abstract should look would be to examine the abstracts of several dozen dissertations that have already been accepted. This is a good approach to see how an entire dissertation is structured and presented.MIT press has published the ACM doctoral dissertation award series for over a decade, so you may find some of those to be good examples to read -- they should be in any large technical library.Often, such additional results are published in a separate paper. This chapter should summarize all the important results of the dissertation --- note that this is the only chapter many people will ever read, so it should convey all the important results. What are some significant variations open to future inquiry? Appendices usually are present to hold mundane details that are not published elsewhere, but which are critical to the development of your dissertation.This is also where you should outline some possible future work that can be done in the area. This includes tables of measurement results, configuration details of experimental testbeds, limited source code listings of critical routines or algorithms, etc.You must clearly express the mapping of model to experiment, and the definition of parameters used and measured. This may be where you discuss the effects of technology change on your results.This is also a place where you may wish to point out significant results that you obtained while seeking to prove your central thesis, but which are not themselves supportive of the thesis. This is where you discuss what you found from your work, incidental ideas and results that were not central to your thesis but of value nonetheless, (if you did not have them in Chapter V) and other results.The abstract, for instance, should be a one-page description of your thesis and how you present the proof of it.The abstract should summarize the results of the thesis and should stress the contributions to science made thereby.