pic.twitter.com/wp H9j Gghjk — Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) April 10, 2019 Note how the authors link what they did in their paper with "other research that should have been done or that *somebody* should be doing".
Overall, that's how I distinguish Discussion from Results (linkage to broader works/debates).
Piece extracted from: https://t.co/m O4b N6Vr BI pic.twitter.com/IQUz HNr3Pk — Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) April 10, 2019 I am an Assistant Professor in the Public Administration Division of the Centre for Economic Research and Teaching, CIDE (Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economicas, CIDE, AC) based out of CIDE Region Centro in Aguascalientes, Mexico.
” The discussion section of the manuscript should come after the methods and results section and before the conclusion.
It should relate back directly to the questions posed in your introduction, and contextualize your results within the literature you have covered in your literature review.